The Parallels Between Fundamentalist Christian Support for Trump and the Divine Right of Kings in Medieval Europe
The phenomenon of fundamentalist Christian support for Donald Trump has been a significant and polarizing aspect of American politics in recent years. While the reasons behind this support are complex and multifaceted, it is intriguing to explore some of the parallels that can be drawn between this modern-day political allegiance and the medieval concept of the divine right of kings in Europe. This essay will delve into the similarities in logic, ideology, and motivations that underpin these two seemingly disparate phenomena.
I. Divine Right of Kings: Historical Context
To better understand the comparison between fundamentalist Christian support for Trump and the divine right of kings, it is essential to first examine the historical context of the latter. The divine right of kings was a concept that gained prominence during the medieval era in Europe, reaching its zenith in the 16th and 17th centuries. It posited that monarchs ruled by divine appointment, with their authority deriving directly from God. This belief granted kings an almost sacred status, making them accountable only to God and not to their subjects.
II. Theological Justifications
Fundamentalist Christians who support Trump often cite their theological convictions as a basis for their allegiance. In a similar vein, proponents of the divine right of kings argued that monarchs were chosen by God and, therefore, were to be obeyed unquestioningly. This theological justification formed the bedrock of both beliefs.
Fundamentalist Christians often view Trump as a champion of conservative values, particularly on issues such as abortion, religious freedom, and conservative judges. They see his presidency as a divine intervention, akin to a modern-day King David, chosen by God to lead the nation. This perspective aligns with the medieval notion of kings as God's representatives on Earth, selected to fulfill divine purposes.
III. Opposition to Secular Authority
Another striking parallel between these two phenomena is the resistance to secular authority. Supporters of Trump, including many fundamentalist Christians, often view the mainstream media, academia, and the political establishment with suspicion, perceiving them as hostile to their values. Similarly, proponents of the divine right of kings argued that any opposition to the monarch was tantamount to opposing God's will, and such dissent was often met with harsh repression.
In both cases, there is a deep distrust of secular institutions that are seen as antagonistic to the religious and moral values upheld by fundamentalist Christians and monarchists, respectively. This distrust fosters a sense of defiance against perceived enemies of their beliefs and a commitment to defending their chosen leader.
IV. The Role of Charisma and Populism
Donald Trump's charismatic and populist appeal has been a central factor in his support among fundamentalist Christians. His unfiltered rhetoric, outsider status, and promise to "make America great again" resonated with a significant portion of the population. In a similar vein, many monarchs in medieval Europe were charismatic figures who cultivated their image as divinely appointed leaders.
Medieval monarchs often presented themselves as protectors of the faith and saviors of their kingdoms, emphasizing their divine mandate to rally support among their subjects. Trump's appeal to fundamentalist Christians mirrors this, as he positioned himself as a defender of Christian values and religious freedom against perceived threats from secular forces.
V. Appeals to Nationalism and Exceptionalism
Both the divine right of kings and the support for Trump have been associated with appeals to nationalism and exceptionalism. Monarchs in medieval Europe frequently portrayed themselves as the embodiment of their nation's destiny, divinely ordained to lead their people to greatness. Likewise, Trump's slogan, "Make America Great Again," tapped into a sense of American exceptionalism and a desire to reclaim a perceived lost national glory.
Fundamentalist Christians who support Trump often believe that he can restore America to a more morally upright and religiously grounded state. This vision aligns with the idea that leaders are chosen by God to guide their nations towards greatness, echoing the medieval belief in the divine destiny of kings.
VI. Resistance to Change
The resistance to change is a common thread running through both fundamentalist Christian support for Trump and the divine right of kings. Monarchs of the medieval era resisted reforms that would reduce their power or curtail their divine authority. Similarly, many fundamentalist Christians who support Trump often oppose progressive social and cultural changes that challenge their traditional values.
For these individuals, Trump represents a bulwark against the perceived encroachment of secularism, liberalism, and moral relativism. They see him as a figure who can protect their way of life from the winds of change, much like how monarchs clung to their divine authority in the face of emerging challenges to their rule.
Conclusion
While it may seem surprising at first glance, there are indeed striking parallels between fundamentalist Christian support for Donald Trump and the medieval concept of the divine right of kings in Europe. Both phenomena draw on theological justifications, resist secular authority, rely on charismatic leadership, appeal to nationalism and exceptionalism, and resist change. By examining these similarities, we gain a deeper understanding of the motivations and beliefs that underpin these complex political and religious alliances. Whether in medieval Europe or contemporary America, the fusion of religious conviction, charismatic leadership, and a belief in divine mandate has continued to shape the course of history and politics.
Ignatius O'Reilly and 'The Divine Right Party': A Comic Farce in A Confederacy of Dunces
The following is presented here in an effort to make the case that Christian fundamentalist support for Trump is foolish, although very sad and dangerous to our democracy.
In the hilarious and absurd world of John Kennedy Toole's novel, "A Confederacy of Dunces," we are introduced to the eccentric and pompous character Ignatius J. Reilly. Among his many peculiarities, Ignatius harbors a delusional dream of founding "The Divine Right Party." In this essay, we'll take a whimsical journey into the depths of Ignatius's mind and explore the comical absurdity of his imaginary political endeavor.
First and foremost, Ignatius's idea of "The Divine Right Party" is a masterclass in irony. In a society that cherishes democracy and individual rights, Ignatius proposes a party that would be an affront to these cherished principles. Ignatius, our misguided medievalist, clearly yearns for a time when kings ruled with an iron fist, accountable only to divine authority. One can't help but chuckle at the thought of him attempting to make a convincing case for divine right rule in the 20th century.
Ignatius's vision for his party is a source of endless amusement. Can you imagine the campaign slogans? "Vote for the King! Divine Right Is Right!" It's a brilliant comedy of anachronism. In an era where political slogans are carefully crafted to appeal to the masses, Ignatius's party would be a relic from a bygone age, one where eloquent speeches and catchy slogans would be utterly out of place.
But the true comedic gold lies in the platform of "The Divine Right Party." Ignatius envisions a society where the whims of a divinely chosen ruler take precedence over reason, law, and accountability. This is a society where you'd have to consult a seer to figure out the latest royal decree on, say, tax policy or healthcare. Imagine trying to file your taxes with the IRS under such a regime. "Sorry, citizen, you can't deduct those business expenses this year; the King has divinely decided that horses are the new currency."
Moreover, Ignatius's party would require a costume change for every citizen. In his world, we'd all be dressed in medieval garb, complete with feathered hats and codpieces. The absurdity of such a fashion statement in modern times is nothing short of comedic genius. Goodbye, skinny jeans and sneakers; hello, chainmail and doublets!
Ignatius's campaign rallies would be nothing short of a sideshow extravaganza. Picture this: knights on horseback jousting for the amusement of the masses, jesters juggling flaming torches, and minstrels playing lutes while singing songs of divine right and destiny. It's a circus fit for the most audacious of political theater.
In Ignatius's world, "The Divine Right Party" would be the ultimate antidote to political correctness. Political correctness? Forget about it! His party would redefine free speech and expression. You could shout "Off with their heads!" at a public gathering without fear of consequences. Sure, it might be a tad unsettling for those on the receiving end, but in Ignatius's divine right utopia, it's all in good fun.
One can't help but wonder how Ignatius would handle the complexities of modern geopolitics. In his mind, international diplomacy would involve sending emissaries to neighboring kingdoms to negotiate alliances and marriages between royal families. "The Divine Right Party's" foreign policy would be a dizzying game of thrones, complete with treacherous plots and castle intrigue.
It's also worth considering how Ignatius would react to the digital age. In a world where the internet reigns supreme, how would he reconcile his love for the quill and parchment with the omnipresence of smartphones and social media? Perhaps he'd propose a divine decree mandating that all citizens send handwritten letters via carrier pigeons for all official communications.
In conclusion, Ignatius O'Reilly's dream of "The Divine Right Party" is a comedic masterpiece of epic proportions. It's a satirical nod to the absurdities of history, where notions of divine right rule are as outdated as powdered wigs. Through his whimsical character and his outlandish political aspirations, John Kennedy Toole invites us to laugh heartily at the quirks of human nature and the follies of our past. So, raise your goblets and toast to the delightful lunacy of "The Divine Right Party," for in the world of Ignatius J. Reilly, the laughter never ends.
